on friday, jasper, sela and carys had another of those nailbitingly awful OT tests over at the duchess of kent.
the duchess of kent, where carys and i faithfully visited twice a week for so long, is now a location i am only at occasionally. i still remember it, but walking through it's doors, standing in line at the shroff, heading over to the kids unit ... it don't shake my head to clear it of memories each time i'm there. or more pragmatically --- i don't know the number of steps from the shroff to the ot/pt offices.
carys and jasper and sela were evaluated to see where they were with manual and dextrous tasks like buttoning, zipping, drawing circles and crosses, stacking blocks, etc. last time they were there all three scored a rather unspectacular 34 or some sort score and we were instructed to do lots of threading, stacking, etc at home. easier instructed than done.
i haven't followed through on those instructions exactly. i've tried, and i know that small world christian kindergarten has lots of excellent dextrous toys, etc. but i can't force the kids to do them, either at school or home. so.
the testing. agonising at times because you are certain your child can to better and you want to force them TO do the task you are certain they are capable of. biting your tongue trying not to insert when your child refuses a task, "i know he can do that..." i am much better in high pressure situations and crises than these sorts of things.
i am happy and proud to announce that carys scored 62 per cent, to be graded as AVERAGE on her testing. keep up the work and bringing out the blocks at home. fair enough. sela, unsurprisingly, scored a lovely 79 percent, and was graded as being above average. i think she feels this is deserved and although she does not know she is aa, she has that "was there ever a doubt?" attitude.
jasper scored 27 per cent.
you read that correctly. 27 per cent.
so why am i writing this blog instead of frantically making appointments with every ot in the sar? because i am convinced that jasper john jingleheimer schmidt failed so spectacularly because he wasn't paying attention. if he was actually listening and gave a ding dong double damn, i am pretty sure he would be your average bear in the woods. but he didnt, and wont, and so 27 he is. which means a lot more work for me.
previously, 27 was a good number. i moved to hong kong when i was 27 --- 'nuff said. however, the gloss has dimmed slightly. i am not so impressed with the jay and his 27. i mean really. saying "i can't" when asked to draw a circle without trying first? give me a break. that's not 27 per cent, that's laziness, where jasper is definitely in the top percentile.
27 per cent indeed.